Assessment of demographics, treatment strategies, and evidence‑based medicine use among diabetic and non‑diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: A cohort study
Bhavik S. Shah1★, Shrikalp S. Deshpande2★ Corresponding author
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, Sector‑15, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India Research Paper.
- 2Department of Pharmacology, K. B. Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India Research Paper.
CORRESPONDENCE
Bhavik S. Shah
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, Sector‑15, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India Research Paper.
Received: 19-05-2013; Revised: 03-08-2013; Accepted: 20-11-2013.
Volume 5, Issue 2 · pp. 139–144 · PUBLISHED 2014 · DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.130058
View on J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. original site ↗
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate and compare clinical and epidemiological characteristics, treatment strategies, and utilization of evidence-based medicine (EBM) among coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with or without diabetes. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational cohort study from a tertiary care hospital in India among patients with CAD (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or chronic stable angina). Data included demographic information, vital signs, personal particulars, risk factors for CAD, treatment strategies, and discharge medications. We evaluated epidemiologic characteristics and treatment strategies for diabetic and non‑diabetic patients. Results: Of 1,073 patients who underwent angiography, 960 patients (30% diabetic) had CAD. Proportion of hypertensive patients was higher among diabetic patients (58 vs 35% non‑diabetic, P < 0.001). Similar proportion of patients received medical management in diabetic vs non‑diabetic CAD patients (35 vs 34%, P = 0.091); in diabetics the use of surgical procedure was higher (22 vs 17%, P = 0.0230) than interventional strategy (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 43 vs 49%, P = 0.0445). Key medications (antiplatelet agents, angiotensin‑converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta‑blockers, and ahtihyperlipidemic agents) were prescribed in 95, 53/12, 67, and 91% diabetic (n = 252) and 96, 51/8, 67, and 94% non‑diabetic (n = 673) patients, respectively on discharge. Conclusions: Clustering of several risk factors at presentation, typically diabetes and hypertension, is common in CAD patients. Though diabetic patients are managed more conservatively, utilization of EBM for diabetic and non‑diabetic patients is consistent with the recommendations.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
As publishedShowing references and in-text citations exactly as published.
Cite this article
SELECT FORMAT
Shah, B. S., & Deshpande, S. S. (2014). Assessment of demographics, treatment strategies, and evidence‑based medicine use among diabetic and non‑diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: A cohort study. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 5(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.130058
