Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Forum Article

    The three Rs of written assessment: The JIPMER experience

    Manikandan S1, Gitanjali B1 Corresponding author

    CORRESPONDENCE

    Gitanjali B

    gitabatman@gmail.com

    Volume 7, Issue 3 · pp. 115–116 · PUBLISHED 2016 · DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.189650

    View on J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    Written assessment has stood the test of time and is widely practiced from elementary school to higher education. Medicine is not an exception and written exams are the main mode of assessing knowledge (cognitive domain) in formative and summative assessments. School education in India is much oriented towards the reproduction of knowledge rather than translation of knowledge. Hence, bright, curious, children are transformed to dull, indifferent parrots in school who get selected for various professional courses based on their ability to remember and reproduce facts. This concept of assessment is well conserved across different levels of education including medical education. The present assessment pattern in medical colleges, both undergraduate and postgraduate, maintains this status quo as we continue to expect students to cram stuff and reproduce it verbatim. This has also changed the way students learn the subject. Most of the students have now switched to third rated notes available in the market with only a very few reading standard textbooks. If we have to produce students who can analyze, think effectively, and treat patients appropriately, we need to change the way our students learn and the content of what they learn. The only effective way to do this is to change the way we assess them.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      S, M., & B, G. (2016). The three Rs of written assessment: The JIPMER experience. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 7(3), 115–116. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.189650