Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Article

    Cell lines in Diabetes Research: A Review

    M.B. Patel1, S.H. Mishra1 Corresponding author

    1. 1Herbal Drug Technology Laboratory, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, INDIA.

    CORRESPONDENCE

    M.B. Patel

    Herbal Drug Technology Laboratory, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, INDIA.

    mayur.pharma@gmail.com

    Volume 2, Issue 4 · pp. 188–205 · PUBLISHED · DOI:

    View on Pharmacogn. Rev. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    Animal models have been used extensively in diabetes research. Early studies used pancreatectomised dogs to confirm the central role of the pancreas in glucose homeostasis, culminating in the discovery and purification of insulin. Selective inbreeding has produced several strains of animal that are considered reasonable models of Type I diabetes, Type II diabetes and related phenotypes such as obesity and insulin resistance. Today, animal experimentation is contentious and subject to legal and ethical restrictions that vary throughout the world. This review gives an overview on the various cell lines used to evaluate the new chemical entities (NCEs) for their hypoglycemic effects. These cell lines are described with their origin/source, characteristic features, mechanism(s), advantages/disadvantages and applications in diabetes research in screening of NCEs for type I and type II diabetes. In addition, it especially describes the appropriate selection and usefulness of different cell line in preclinical testing of various NCEs for the treatment of diabetes.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Patel, M., & Mishra, S. (). Cell lines in Diabetes Research: A Review. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 2(4), 188–205.