Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Article

    Comparative Evaluation of Peyton’s Four-step Approach and Conventional Teaching Methods for Injection Techniques: A Prospective, Interventional Crossover Study

    Rushika Modi1★, Mira Desai2, Aparajita Shukla3, Chetan Parikh1, Punit Patel4, Jwalantkumar Joshi4★ Corresponding author

    1. 1Department of Pharmacology, GMERS Medical College, Vadnagar, Gujarat, India.
    2. 2Department of Pharmacology, Dr. M.K. Shah Medical College & Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
    3. 3Department of Community Medicine, Smt. N. H. L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
    4. 4Department of Community Medicine, Banas Medical College & Research Institute, Palanpur, Gujarat, India.

    CORRESPONDENCE

    Rushika Modi

    Department of Pharmacology, GMERS Medical College, Vadnagar, Gujarat, India.

    rushikamodi91@gmail.com

    Received: 07-07-2025; Revised: 09-12-2025; Accepted: 02-01-2026.

    Volume 17, Issue 3 · pp. 463–470 · PUBLISHED 2026 · DOI: 10.1177/0976500X261417403

    View on J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    Background: Traditional teaching methods can pose challenges for learners, particularly when it comes to applying theoretical knowledge in practical settings. In contrast, Peyton’s four-step approach provides a structured, learner-centered framework that facilitates better understanding and skill acquisition. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Peyton’s four-step approach with conventional teaching methods for teaching intramuscular and intravenous injection techniques among undergraduate medical students. Materials and Methods: This prospective, interventional crossover study was conducted at Nootan Medical College, Gujarat, with 150 Phase II MBBS students. Participants were randomly assigned to either Peyton’s approach or the conventional method for intramuscular and intravenous injection training. Assessments included multiple choice questions (MCQs), performance checklists, and feedback on a Likert scale. Results: Peyton’s approach significantly outperformed the conventional method, with higher post-test MCQ scores (Group A: 4.68 ± 0.52 vs. 3.98 ± 0.70; Group B: 4.34 ± 0.86 vs. 3.48 ± 1.14, p < .0001). Performance evaluations showed enhanced skill acquisition, with significant improvements in both intramuscular and intravenous injection techniques. Conclusion: Peyton’s four-step approach is an effective teaching strategy that enhances skill acquisition, retention, and student confidence, offering significant advantages over conventional methods in medical education.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Modi, R., Desai, M., Shukla, A., Parikh, C., Patel, P., & Joshi, J. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Peyton’s Four-step Approach and Conventional Teaching Methods for Injection Techniques: A Prospective, Interventional Crossover Study. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 17(3), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976500X261417403