Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Article

    Pharmacokinetic Study of Ceftriamidine Sodium for Injection in Chinese Healthy Volunteers

    Zihan Liu1,2, Ganmi Wang3,4, Ning Chen1,2, Jiarong Wu3,4, Yueyuan You3,4, Fei Qin3,4★, Huan Zhou1,2★★ Corresponding author

    1. 1Clinical Trial Research Center of First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China.
    2. 2Key Laboratory of Innovative Pharmaceutical Research and Clinical Evaluation Jointly Constructed by Anhui, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China.
    3. 3Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Pharmacology, Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical Holdings Co., Ltd., Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical General Factory, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
    4. 4Guangdong Key Laboratory for Core Technology of Chemical Raw Materials and Pharmaceutical Formulations, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

    CORRESPONDENCE

    Fei Qin

    Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Pharmacology, Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical Holdings Co., Ltd., Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical General Factory, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

    102825@byszc.com

    Received: 28-10-2025; Revised: 13-12-2025; Accepted: 15-01-2026.

    Volume 17, Issue 4 · pp. 571–578 · PUBLISHED 2026 · DOI: 10.1177/0976500X261420055

    View on J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    Background: MRSA and PRSP resistance has surged over 30 years, threatening clinical outcomes; China-developed cefathiamidine sodium, with enhanced pharmacokinetics, offers potent activity against these Gram-positive pathogens. Objectives: This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic profile of injectable ceftriamidine sodium in healthy volunteers and compares its pharmacokinetics with those of cefathiamidine. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial was a randomized and controlled study. The ceftriamidine sodium group (administered ceftriamidine sodium or placebo) employed a double-blind design with multiple administrations and dose escalation, whereas the cefathiamidine group (administered cefathiamidine) utilized an open-label design with single and multiple continuous administrations. The clinical trial involved ceftriamidine sodium at doses of 3.0 and 4.0 g, corresponding to cefathiamidine doses of 0.5 and 2.0 g. Volunteers received the corresponding drug infusions as per the protocol, and a series of blood samples were collected at specified time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results: In the 3.0 and 4.0 g dose groups of ceftriamidine sodium, the t1/2, Tmax, and Cmax were 1.98–2.11 h, 0.50 h, and 321.14–448.80 μg/mL, respectively. Upon reaching steady state after multiple doses of 3.0–4.0 g, no significant drug accumulation was observed. Following multiple administrations of cefathiamidine at 0.5 and 2.0 g, the peak time at steady state was 0.50 h, t1/2 was 1.26–1.17 h, and Cmax was 48.11–194.40 μg/mL. Conclusion: The half-life of ceftriamidine sodium (1.98–2.11 h) is almost twice as long as that of cefathiamidine (1.17–1.26 h), indicating its pharmacokinetic superiority in reducing the frequency of administration.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Liu, Z., Wang, G., Chen, N., Wu, J., You, Y., Qin, F., & Zhou, H. (2026). Pharmacokinetic Study of Ceftriamidine Sodium for Injection in Chinese Healthy Volunteers. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 17(4), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976500X261420055