Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Article

    Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety of Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, and Alemtuzumab in Treating Relapsing–Remitting, Primary Progressive, and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

    Pooja Raina1, Somnath Basu2, Ramesh K Goyal1, Pravat K Sahoo1, Rajani Mathur1 Corresponding author

    1. 1Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, DPSRU, Pushp Vihar, New Delhi, India.
    2. 2Assistant Drug Controller (India), Central Drug Standard Control Organisation, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

    CORRESPONDENCE

    Pooja Raina

    Rajani Mathur,Department of Pharmacology, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, DPSRU, Pushp Vihar, New Delhi, Delhi 110017, India.

    mathurajani@gmail.com

    Received: 29-09-2021; Accepted: 13-12-2021.

    Volume 13, Issue 1 · pp. 14–23 · PUBLISHED 2022 · DOI: 10.1177/0976500X221080225

    View on J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    Three monoclonal antibodies—natalizumab (NTZ), ocrelizumab (OCR), and alemtuzumab (ALM)—are the mainstays for the treatment of both relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, their safety in patients with MS is analyzed and compared for rational use, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. All clinical studies published between 2016 and 2020 with the primary outcome of the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) with the use of NTZ, OCR, and ALM in the treatment of MS were systematically searched in the PubMed database. In this review, the percentage of patients reporting AEs was calculated and compared. The most common AEs associated with the use of NTZ, OCR, and ALM were infection and infestation. The percentage of patients reporting urinary tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, and herpes was 16% using natalizumab, 7% using natalizumab and ocrelizumab, and 2% with ocrelizumab, respectively. The most common AEs, such as rashes, pyrexia, and influenza, were reported with ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab. Additionally, alemtuzumab was associated with immune thrombocytopenia (2%), respiratory infections (7%), and thyroid dysfunction (43%). All these data outcomes show that of the three monoclonal antibodies, natalizumab and ocrelizumab were associated with a reduced incidence of adverse events, making them a safer choice for MS.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Raina, P., Basu, S., Goyal, R. K., Sahoo, P. K., & Mathur, R. (2022). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety of Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, and Alemtuzumab in Treating Relapsing–Remitting, Primary Progressive, and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 13(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976500X221080225