Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Forum Article

    Ethics of expert opinion and the observations of the department-related parliamentary standing committee on the CDSCO

    Amar Jesani1 Corresponding author

    CORRESPONDENCE

    Amar Jesani

    amar.jesani@gmail.com

    Volume 3, Issue 4 · pp. 297–299 · PUBLISHED 2012 · DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.103684

    View on J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    On May 8, 2012, the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee (henceforth Committee) presented to the Parliament its 59th report on the functioning of Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) (henceforth DRPSC Report).[1]With the media highlighting its findings, there was a public outcry on the way the country’s drugs regulator is functioning. At a time when the credibility of Parliamentary politicians is at the lowest ebb, report provided some hope as members of the parliament constituting the committee made some very incisive comments and recommendations to improve the regulatory work of the CDSCO.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Jesani, A. (2012). Ethics of expert opinion and the observations of the department-related parliamentary standing committee on the CDSCO. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 3(4), 297–299. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.103684