Determination of Five Chemical Markers in DF Formula, the Herbal Composition of Ephedra intermedia, Rheum palmatum, and Lithospermum erythrorhizon, Using High‑performance Liquid Chromatography‑ultraviolet Detection
Birang Jeong1★, Jong Seong Roh2, Michung Yoon3, Yoosik Yoon4, Soon Shik Shin2, Hyun Joo Cho5, Yong Soo Kwon1★ Corresponding author
- 1Heejung Yang Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341.
- 2Department of Formula Sciences and Research Center of Korean Medicine for Diabetes and Obesity, College of Korean Medicine, Dong‑Eui University, Busan 47227.
- 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mok‑Won University, Daejeon 35349.
- 4Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Chung‑Ang University.
- 5Department of Research and Development, Hamsoa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.
CORRESPONDENCE
Birang Jeong
Heejung Yang Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341.
Received: 08-05-2017; Revised: 03-06-2017.
Volume 14, Issue 54 · pp. 162–166 · PUBLISHED 10 April 2018 · DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_189_17
View on Pharmacogn. Mag. original site ↗
ABSTRACT
Background: DF formula is a herbal preparation comprised three medicinal herbs, namely, Ephedra intermedia, Rheum palmatum, and Lithospermum erythrorhizon, which is being used for the treatment of obesity and liver fibrosis in Korean local clinics. Objective: Since the abovementioned three herbs exist with different proportions in DF formula and their chemical markers have different physiochemical properties; it is quite challenging to develop an analytical methodology for the determination of these chemical markers. Materials and Methods: For the analysis of the three herbs, five chemicals, (+)‑pseudoephedrine (1) and (−)‑ephedrine (2) for E. intermedia, aloe‑emodin (3), and chrysophanol (4) for R. palmatum, and shikonin (5) for L. erythrorhizon, were selected for method validation of DF formula, and the analytical conditions were optimized and validated using high‑performance liquid chromatography coupled with an ultraviolet detector (HPLC‑UV). Results: The specificities for the five compounds 1–5 were determined by their UV absorption spectra (1–4: 215 nm and 5: 520 nm). Their calibration curves showed good linear regressions with high correlation coefficient values (R2 > 0.9997). The limits of detection of these five markers were in the range 0.4–2.1 ng/mL, with the exception of 5 (12.7 ng/mL). The intraday variability for all the chemical markers was less than a Relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3%, except for 5 (RSD = 12.6%). In the case of interday analysis, 1 (1.0%), 2 (3.1%), and 4 (3.7%) showed much lower variabilities (RSD < 5%) than 3 (7.6%) and 5 (8.2%). Moreover, the five chemical markers showed good recoveries with good accuracies in the range of 90%–110%. Conclusions: The developed HPLC‑UV method for the determination of the five chemical markers of the components of DF formula was validated.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
As publishedShowing references and in-text citations exactly as published.
Cite this article
SELECT FORMAT
Jeong, B., Roh, J. S., Yoon, M., Yoon, Y., Shin, S. S., Cho, H. J., & Kwon, Y. S. (2018). Determination of Five Chemical Markers in DF Formula, the Herbal Composition of Ephedra intermedia, Rheum palmatum, and Lithospermum erythrorhizon, Using High‑performance Liquid Chromatography‑ultraviolet Detection. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 14(54), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.4103/pm.pm_189_17
