Phcog.Net logo

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

    SEE ALL 6 JOURNALS
    Article

    Gas Chromatography‑Mass Spectrometry Fingerprint and in vitro Cytotoxic Studies of Rubus steudneri Leaf Fractions against Michigan Cancer Foundation‑7 Breast Cancer Cell Line

    Raghavendra Lakshmana Shetty Hallur2,3,4, Chaitanya V. N. L. Motamarri5, Prashith Kekuda T. Ramamoorthy6, Chetan D. Murthy7, Ravikumar Patil H. Siddappa8, Vijayananda N. Bramhanakonda9 Corresponding author

    1. 1Department of Pharmacology, HSK College of Pharmacy, BVVS Campus, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
    2. 2College of Medical and Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Oromia, Ethiopia.
    3. 3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo State, Brazil.
    4. 4Department of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
    5. 5Department of Microbiology, SRNMN College of Applied Sciences, N.E.S Campus, Shivamogga.
    6. 6Department of Biotechnology, NMAM Institute of Technology, NITTE, Karkala.
    7. 7Department of Food Technology, Davanagere University, Davanagere.
    8. 8ITC Life Sciences and Technology Centre, Foods Division, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

    CORRESPONDENCE

    Raghavendra Lakshmana Shetty Hallur

    College of Medical and Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Oromia, Ethiopia.

    raghu.biogem@gmail.com

    Received: 30-07-2020; Revised: 09-09-2020; Accepted: 23-02-2021.

    Volume 17, Issue 5S · pp. S54–S62 · PUBLISHED 10 June 2021 · DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_324_20

    View on Pharmacogn. Mag. original site ↗

    ABSTRACT

    Aim: Rubus steudneri Schweinf. (Rosaceae) is one of three Rubus species that grow in Ethiopia. Studies of this species have been restricted to in vitro antioxidant, antidiabetic, and nutritional evaluation. Until today, no identification has been made of its phytochemical fingerprints, resulting in an unclear picture of its phytochemical constituents. This study investigated the phytochemical composition of R. steudneri and its in vitro cytotoxicity against Michigan Cancer Foundation‑7 (MCF‑7) breast cancer cell lines and Vero cell lines. Materials and Methods: The leaf powder was subjected to liquid–liquid fractionation using n‑hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, methanol, and water as solvents and the obtained fractions were subjected to flash chromatography and in vitro cytotoxicity studies in MCF‑7 cell lines at concentrations from 1 to 1000 µg/mL, using 3‑(4,5‑dimethylthiazol‑2‑yl)‑2,5‑diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Results: The chloroform fraction proved to be the most promising of the bioactive fractions, with 50% of cytotoxicity inhibition for concentrations of 10 µg/mL on MCF‑7 cell lines and 125 µg/mL on Vero cell lines. Two important drug leads, namely butyl isobutyl phthalate and 2‑pyrrolidinone 5‑(cyclohexylmethyl), were identified in chloroform fraction using gas chromatography‑mass spectrometry (GC‑MS) and may be responsible for the in vitro cytotoxicity. Flow cytometer results indicated that the chloroform fraction arrests cell cycle in the sub‑G1 phase at a concentration of 100 µg/mL on MCF‑7 cell lines, which proves that metabolites in this fraction may belong to the apoptotic population. Conclusion: In this study, butyl isobutyl phthalate and pyrrolidinone 5‑(cyclohexylmethyl), which have significant cytotoxic effects and cell cycle arrest, are extracted. Further in‑depth research is in progress to prove the anticancer activity of R. steudneri in search of new leads for anticancer drugs.

    KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Hallur, R. L. S., Motamarri, C. V. N. L., Ramamoorthy, P. K. T., Murthy, C. D., Siddappa, R. P. H., & Bramhanakonda, V. N. (2021). Gas Chromatography‑Mass Spectrometry Fingerprint and in vitro Cytotoxic Studies of Rubus steudneri Leaf Fractions against Michigan Cancer Foundation‑7 Breast Cancer Cell Line. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 17(5S), S54–S62. https://doi.org/10.4103/pm.pm_324_20